<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (10) TMI 1014 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174841</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders granting immunity from interest, penalty, and prosecution to the petitioners, contingent upon compliance with payment conditions. However, when the petitioners failed to meet these conditions, the immunities were withdrawn, and penalties and interest were imposed. The Court affirmed the conclusiveness of the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders, preventing the reopening of settled duty amounts. The petitioners&#039; non-compliance with pre-deposit orders led to the dismissal of their appeals. Ultimately, the Court dismissed all petitions, reinforcing the importance of adherence to Settlement Commission orders and payment obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 11:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403082" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (10) TMI 1014 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174841</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders granting immunity from interest, penalty, and prosecution to the petitioners, contingent upon compliance with payment conditions. However, when the petitioners failed to meet these conditions, the immunities were withdrawn, and penalties and interest were imposed. The Court affirmed the conclusiveness of the Settlement Commission&#039;s orders, preventing the reopening of settled duty amounts. The petitioners&#039; non-compliance with pre-deposit orders led to the dismissal of their appeals. Ultimately, the Court dismissed all petitions, reinforcing the importance of adherence to Settlement Commission orders and payment obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>