<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (1) TMI 338 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174840</link>
    <description>Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to apply its own mind to the relevant material and record genuine satisfaction, especially where the proposed detenus are already in custody. A detention order based on a verbatim reproduction of the police dossier, with only personal particulars altered, indicates no independent consideration and cannot be sustained. If the record also shows no awareness of existing custody or assessment of the need for preventive detention despite that custody, the order is liable to be quashed. On the facts noted, the detention orders were quashed and release was directed unless the detenus were required in another case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2015 10:05:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (1) TMI 338 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174840</link>
      <description>Preventive detention requires the detaining authority to apply its own mind to the relevant material and record genuine satisfaction, especially where the proposed detenus are already in custody. A detention order based on a verbatim reproduction of the police dossier, with only personal particulars altered, indicates no independent consideration and cannot be sustained. If the record also shows no awareness of existing custody or assessment of the need for preventive detention despite that custody, the order is liable to be quashed. On the facts noted, the detention orders were quashed and release was directed unless the detenus were required in another case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>