<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1956 (8) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174839</link>
    <description>Additional income-tax on excess dividend was held not chargeable under section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, because the charging provision permits tax only on total income and the rate must bear a real relation to that income or a part of it. A levy triggered instead by an external factor, namely dividend distributed beyond a permitted ceiling, was outside the scope of income tax and could not be sustained as a valid charge under the First Schedule to the Indian Finance Act. The provision was treated as penal in character, but it could not be imposed through section 3 as a charging mechanism for income-tax; the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2015 09:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1956 (8) TMI 50 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174839</link>
      <description>Additional income-tax on excess dividend was held not chargeable under section 3 of the Income-tax Act, 1922, because the charging provision permits tax only on total income and the rate must bear a real relation to that income or a part of it. A levy triggered instead by an external factor, namely dividend distributed beyond a permitted ceiling, was outside the scope of income tax and could not be sustained as a valid charge under the First Schedule to the Indian Finance Act. The provision was treated as penal in character, but it could not be imposed through section 3 as a charging mechanism for income-tax; the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 1956 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174839</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>