<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2098 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266824</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against a service tax demand on outbound tours, citing the precedent set by Cox &amp;amp; Kings Ltd. case, which established no service tax liability for services provided for outbound tours beyond India&#039;s territory. The judgment clarified the distinction in service tax liability between domestic and outbound tours, affirming that outbound tours are not subject to service tax based on existing legal interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2098 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266824</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal against a service tax demand on outbound tours, citing the precedent set by Cox &amp;amp; Kings Ltd. case, which established no service tax liability for services provided for outbound tours beyond India&#039;s territory. The judgment clarified the distinction in service tax liability between domestic and outbound tours, affirming that outbound tours are not subject to service tax based on existing legal interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266824</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>