<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2081 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266807</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs House Agent&#039;s authority to file refund claims on behalf of importers, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s stay application. It clarified that challenges to the Customs Refund Application Regulations should be directed to the High Court or Supreme Court, not the Tribunal. Additionally, related appeals concerning classification issues were listed for final hearing, ensuring a thorough resolution of the legal matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2015 07:53:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403032" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2081 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266807</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Customs House Agent&#039;s authority to file refund claims on behalf of importers, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s stay application. It clarified that challenges to the Customs Refund Application Regulations should be directed to the High Court or Supreme Court, not the Tribunal. Additionally, related appeals concerning classification issues were listed for final hearing, ensuring a thorough resolution of the legal matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266807</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>