<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2070 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266796</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that art work and plate making expenses not utilized in manufacturing should not be included in the assessable value. The decision was based on the finding that these costs were inherent in the printing process, outsourced, and not utilized. The Tribunal allowed the appeals without addressing the extended limitation period or penalties, citing a similar precedent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2015 07:52:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=403021" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2070 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266796</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that art work and plate making expenses not utilized in manufacturing should not be included in the assessable value. The decision was based on the finding that these costs were inherent in the printing process, outsourced, and not utilized. The Tribunal allowed the appeals without addressing the extended limitation period or penalties, citing a similar precedent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266796</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>