https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266787 The court held that the attachment of the immovable property by the Income Tax Department was unsustainable as the property did not belong to the third respondent at the time of attachment. The court directed the removal of the attachment, numbering, and release of the sale deed by the Registering Authority. The first respondent was allowed to pursue other properties of the third respondent for tax dues. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2015 22:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266787 The court held that the attachment of the immovable property by the Income Tax Department was unsustainable as the property did not belong to the third respondent at the time of attachment. The court directed the removal of the attachment, numbering, and release of the sale deed by the Registering Authority. The first respondent was allowed to pursue other properties of the third respondent for tax dues. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266787