<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2040 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, directing the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the issue in light of admitted questions before the High Court. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of establishing the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions and ensuring proper application of mind in reopening assessment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2022 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2040 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, directing the Assessing Officer to reevaluate the issue in light of admitted questions before the High Court. The appeals were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of establishing the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions and ensuring proper application of mind in reopening assessment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>