<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (7) TMI 925 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174830</link>
    <description>Bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in an NDPS prosecution where the forensic report identified the seized substance as Ketamine Hydrochloride. On a prima facie assessment of the record, the Court found support for the contention that the substance did not appear to fall within Schedule I, II or III of the NDPS Act. That prima facie position justified grant of bail, subject to conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2017 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402940" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (7) TMI 925 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174830</link>
      <description>Bail under Section 439 CrPC was considered in an NDPS prosecution where the forensic report identified the seized substance as Ketamine Hydrochloride. On a prima facie assessment of the record, the Court found support for the contention that the substance did not appear to fall within Schedule I, II or III of the NDPS Act. That prima facie position justified grant of bail, subject to conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174830</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>