https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174828 Bail already granted should not be cancelled merely because a later forensic report conflicts with an earlier authorised laboratory report finding no contraband. Cancellation requires recognised supervening circumstances such as misuse of liberty, tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, or flight risk, and those grounds were not shown here. The NDPS Act's stricter bail restriction was also not established on the facts, as the material indicated only an intermediate quantity and no basis to override the earlier grant of bail. The cancellation order was therefore unsustainable, and the accused was entitled to remain on bail. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Nov 2015 15:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174828 Bail already granted should not be cancelled merely because a later forensic report conflicts with an earlier authorised laboratory report finding no contraband. Cancellation requires recognised supervening circumstances such as misuse of liberty, tampering with evidence, influencing witnesses, or flight risk, and those grounds were not shown here. The NDPS Act's stricter bail restriction was also not established on the facts, as the material indicated only an intermediate quantity and no basis to override the earlier grant of bail. The cancellation order was therefore unsustainable, and the accused was entitled to remain on bail. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 07 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174828