https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=859 The court held that the immediate suspension of the petitioner's Customs House Agent (CHA) license under Regulation 20(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations (CHALR), 2004 was valid, as Regulation 22's procedural requirements for suspension did not apply to interim measures like Regulation 20(2). The petitioner was directed to either appeal or seek a review of the suspension order within two weeks, with the impugned order remaining suspended until such action was taken. The court did not delve into other case merits, and no costs were awarded. en-us Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=859 The court held that the immediate suspension of the petitioner's Customs House Agent (CHA) license under Regulation 20(2) of the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulations (CHALR), 2004 was valid, as Regulation 22's procedural requirements for suspension did not apply to interim measures like Regulation 20(2). The petitioner was directed to either appeal or seek a review of the suspension order within two weeks, with the impugned order remaining suspended until such action was taken. The court did not delve into other case merits, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=859