https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266755 The court disposed of the writ petition while keeping contentions open for both parties. The petitioner was allowed to seek reliefs permissible by law, address concerns about property attachment, and apply for interim reliefs. The court advised considering benefits under the Limitation Act, 1963, and pursuing legal remedies through a civil suit to establish property rights. The judgment emphasized resolving disputed issues in civil court rather than through a writ petition, providing guidance on seeking appropriate legal recourse and reliefs. en-us Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 31 Dec 2015 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266755 The court disposed of the writ petition while keeping contentions open for both parties. The petitioner was allowed to seek reliefs permissible by law, address concerns about property attachment, and apply for interim reliefs. The court advised considering benefits under the Limitation Act, 1963, and pursuing legal remedies through a civil suit to establish property rights. The judgment emphasized resolving disputed issues in civil court rather than through a writ petition, providing guidance on seeking appropriate legal recourse and reliefs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 01 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266755