https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266754 In an NDPS bail matter involving alleged ketamine hydrochloride, the Court noted that the substance was not clearly shown to fall within the relevant NDPS schedules, and the Customs Officer-recorded confession was not relied on at the bail stage because a confession to a Customs Officer is barred under Section 25 of the Evidence Act. The seizure material also did not prima facie establish exclusive possession of the contraband by the petitioner, as access and custody of the baggage were not satisfactorily shown. In the absence of clear prima facie material on possession and involvement, bail was granted on conditions. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266754 In an NDPS bail matter involving alleged ketamine hydrochloride, the Court noted that the substance was not clearly shown to fall within the relevant NDPS schedules, and the Customs Officer-recorded confession was not relied on at the bail stage because a confession to a Customs Officer is barred under Section 25 of the Evidence Act. The seizure material also did not prima facie establish exclusive possession of the contraband by the petitioner, as access and custody of the baggage were not satisfactorily shown. In the absence of clear prima facie material on possession and involvement, bail was granted on conditions. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266754