<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2016 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266742</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that interest income earned on borrowed funds parked in Fixed Deposit Receipts should be treated as income from other sources as the taxpayer failed to prove commercial expediency. The issue of income from the sale of wastage materials during construction activities was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 13:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402911" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2016 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266742</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that interest income earned on borrowed funds parked in Fixed Deposit Receipts should be treated as income from other sources as the taxpayer failed to prove commercial expediency. The issue of income from the sale of wastage materials during construction activities was remanded to the Assessing Officer for verification. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266742</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>