<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2007 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions for A.Y. 2000-01 and 2002-03, dismissing the appeals due to lack of evidence for loan repayment and control over bank accounts. However, the appeals for A.Y. 2003-04 and 2004-05 were allowed as the additions based on vague notations were deemed unjustified. The appeals related to charging interest were dismissed as contingent on the primary findings. The order was pronounced on September 15, 2015.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2007 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the additions for A.Y. 2000-01 and 2002-03, dismissing the appeals due to lack of evidence for loan repayment and control over bank accounts. However, the appeals for A.Y. 2003-04 and 2004-05 were allowed as the additions based on vague notations were deemed unjustified. The appeals related to charging interest were dismissed as contingent on the primary findings. The order was pronounced on September 15, 2015.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>