https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266730 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings for all three issues, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The additions on account of unexplained cash credit, unexplained advances received from patients, and failure to establish the genuineness of sundry creditors were found to be unsubstantiated. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transactions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's claims. en-us Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Oct 2015 11:08:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266730 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings for all three issues, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The additions on account of unexplained cash credit, unexplained advances received from patients, and failure to establish the genuineness of sundry creditors were found to be unsubstantiated. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to establish the legitimacy of the transactions, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's claims. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266730