<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2001 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266727</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellant regarding service tax liability for laying Optical Fiber Cables. The Tribunal considered the CBEC circular and previous legal decisions, noting similarities to cases ruled in favor of appellants. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for the appellant based on the circular and legal precedents, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance without additional deposits. The Tribunal emphasized that the nature of the cables did not change the core issue, ultimately setting aside the service tax demand and allowing the appeal, except for the deposited amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2016 16:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2001 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266727</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding in favor of the appellant regarding service tax liability for laying Optical Fiber Cables. The Tribunal considered the CBEC circular and previous legal decisions, noting similarities to cases ruled in favor of appellants. Despite Revenue&#039;s arguments, the Tribunal found a prima facie case for the appellant based on the circular and legal precedents, leading to the appeal&#039;s allowance without additional deposits. The Tribunal emphasized that the nature of the cables did not change the core issue, ultimately setting aside the service tax demand and allowing the appeal, except for the deposited amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266727</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>