<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 39 - Appellate Tribunal, Chennai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=855</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing authorities to facilitate the refund process for duty paid on defective goods under a subsequent Bill of Entry. It held that the appellants fulfilled the conditions of the Customs Notification, including surrendering defective goods, making them eligible for exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the role of the Asst./Dy. Commissioner in assessment and refund claims, upholding the rejection of the claim based on non-compliance with specific conditions of the Exemption Notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40289" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 39 - Appellate Tribunal, Chennai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=855</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing authorities to facilitate the refund process for duty paid on defective goods under a subsequent Bill of Entry. It held that the appellants fulfilled the conditions of the Customs Notification, including surrendering defective goods, making them eligible for exemption. The Tribunal emphasized the role of the Asst./Dy. Commissioner in assessment and refund claims, upholding the rejection of the claim based on non-compliance with specific conditions of the Exemption Notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=855</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>