<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1997 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266723</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim of service tax filed after the limitation period, emphasizing the absolute nature of statutory time limits for refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of a mistake in paying the tax, the Tribunal ruled that the limitation period cannot be extended, citing established legal principles and previous court decisions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the limitation aspect must be considered in refund claims, even in cases of erroneous payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1997 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266723</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the rejection of a refund claim of service tax filed after the limitation period, emphasizing the absolute nature of statutory time limits for refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. Despite the appellant&#039;s argument of a mistake in paying the tax, the Tribunal ruled that the limitation period cannot be extended, citing established legal principles and previous court decisions. The appeal was dismissed, affirming that the limitation aspect must be considered in refund claims, even in cases of erroneous payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266723</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>