<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1993 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Revenue, remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for verification of transaction values. The Respondent, a Government of India Undertaking, was deemed entitled to the refund claim in principle, with the condition that the verification be completed within three months. The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction of notional rail freight was in accordance with the Agreement, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against the refund claim based on non-payment of the agreed price by buyers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1993 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by the Revenue, remanding the case to the adjudicating authority for verification of transaction values. The Respondent, a Government of India Undertaking, was deemed entitled to the refund claim in principle, with the condition that the verification be completed within three months. The Tribunal emphasized that the deduction of notional rail freight was in accordance with the Agreement, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s argument against the refund claim based on non-payment of the agreed price by buyers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>