<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1985 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266711</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was entitled to the remission of duty. The denial of duty remission and confirmation of payment of duty and penalty were overturned. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s delayed intimation to the department was justified due to the circumstances of the fire occurring over a weekend. It was established that the fire was caused by a short circuit, absolving the appellant of negligence. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the insurance company did not sanction any amount towards duty in their claim, supporting the claim for duty remission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2015 08:25:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1985 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266711</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, holding that the appellant was entitled to the remission of duty. The denial of duty remission and confirmation of payment of duty and penalty were overturned. The Tribunal found that the appellant&#039;s delayed intimation to the department was justified due to the circumstances of the fire occurring over a weekend. It was established that the fire was caused by a short circuit, absolving the appellant of negligence. The appellant successfully demonstrated that the insurance company did not sanction any amount towards duty in their claim, supporting the claim for duty remission.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266711</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>