<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT (MADRAS)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=853</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for mandamus to modify the Electronic Data Interchange System for Customs Act compliance. It held that the EDI System already accommodated actual transaction values as per the Customs Act, with necessary updates in place. The court emphasized the importance of Rule 4 in determining transaction values and clarified that the system captured essential details for assessment, denying the petitioner&#039;s plea for additional buyer information. The respondents were directed to review the petitioner&#039;s representations on system changes within two weeks but declined to revert to manual filing. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, as the main relief was not granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40287" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 15 - HIGH COURT (MADRAS)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=853</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s request for mandamus to modify the Electronic Data Interchange System for Customs Act compliance. It held that the EDI System already accommodated actual transaction values as per the Customs Act, with necessary updates in place. The court emphasized the importance of Rule 4 in determining transaction values and clarified that the system captured essential details for assessment, denying the petitioner&#039;s plea for additional buyer information. The respondents were directed to review the petitioner&#039;s representations on system changes within two weeks but declined to revert to manual filing. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, as the main relief was not granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>