<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1978 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266704</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the Applicant&#039;s request for a waiver of pre-deposit of cenvat credit and penalty totaling Rs. 62.27 lakhs. The dispute centered on the interpretation of &quot;place of removal&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, concerning services availed in the Port area for exporting goods. The Tribunal, relying on the decision in Honest Bio-vet Pvt. Ltd. case, determined that the load Port should be considered the place of removal for exports, supporting the Applicant&#039;s argument. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, allowing recovery to be stayed during the appeal process, providing relief to the Applicant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:55:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1978 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266704</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the Applicant&#039;s request for a waiver of pre-deposit of cenvat credit and penalty totaling Rs. 62.27 lakhs. The dispute centered on the interpretation of &quot;place of removal&quot; under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, concerning services availed in the Port area for exporting goods. The Tribunal, relying on the decision in Honest Bio-vet Pvt. Ltd. case, determined that the load Port should be considered the place of removal for exports, supporting the Applicant&#039;s argument. As a result, the Tribunal waived the pre-deposit requirement, allowing recovery to be stayed during the appeal process, providing relief to the Applicant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266704</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>