<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (10) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=852</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, considering Radio Terminals as Base Transceivers Station (BTS) ancillary equipment eligible for exemption under relevant notifications. The Court emphasized the technical role of Radio Terminals in cellular network systems, highlighting their specific design for GSM networks and interconnectivity function between BTS and BSC. This decision clarified the distinction between independent equipment and ancillary equipment for customs duty purposes, ensuring proper application of regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (10) TMI 9 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=852</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, considering Radio Terminals as Base Transceivers Station (BTS) ancillary equipment eligible for exemption under relevant notifications. The Court emphasized the technical role of Radio Terminals in cellular network systems, highlighting their specific design for GSM networks and interconnectivity function between BTS and BSC. This decision clarified the distinction between independent equipment and ancillary equipment for customs duty purposes, ensuring proper application of regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>