https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266698 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appellant's appeal in a case concerning the violation of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules 2002. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order based on the unconstitutionality of the rule as established by a judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. The appellant was granted consequential relief, but the Revenue was permitted to demand interest for the period until the outstanding dues were settled in accordance with the rule. The stay application was also disposed of as part of the judgment. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266698 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD allowed the appellant's appeal in a case concerning the violation of Rule 8 (3A) of the Central Excise Rules 2002. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order based on the unconstitutionality of the rule as established by a judgment of the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court. The appellant was granted consequential relief, but the Revenue was permitted to demand interest for the period until the outstanding dues were settled in accordance with the rule. The stay application was also disposed of as part of the judgment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266698