<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1969 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266695</link>
    <description>Residues arising from refining vegetable oil, including gad, sludge, acid oil and spent earth, were treated as eligible for the relevant exemption because earlier decisions had already held that spent earth remained earth after processing and that similar process residues such as impurities, soap stock and wax qualified as exempt waste. The controversy was therefore regarded as settled and not open to re-examination, with the stated result that the exemption applied and the demand, interest and penalty could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1969 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266695</link>
      <description>Residues arising from refining vegetable oil, including gad, sludge, acid oil and spent earth, were treated as eligible for the relevant exemption because earlier decisions had already held that spent earth remained earth after processing and that similar process residues such as impurities, soap stock and wax qualified as exempt waste. The controversy was therefore regarded as settled and not open to re-examination, with the stated result that the exemption applied and the demand, interest and penalty could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>