<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1968 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266694</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the Order-in-Appeal confirming interest demand but setting aside the penalty. The issue centered on interest recoverability based on the date of goods clearance, particularly in cases of post-clearance price revisions. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal held that interest liability starts from the month following the duty&#039;s due date, emphasizing the due date&#039;s importance in relation to goods clearance. Dismissing the appeal, the Tribunal underscored the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments over conflicting High Court decisions, ultimately upholding the interest demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1968 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266694</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the Order-in-Appeal confirming interest demand but setting aside the penalty. The issue centered on interest recoverability based on the date of goods clearance, particularly in cases of post-clearance price revisions. Relying on Supreme Court precedents, the Tribunal held that interest liability starts from the month following the duty&#039;s due date, emphasizing the due date&#039;s importance in relation to goods clearance. Dismissing the appeal, the Tribunal underscored the binding nature of Supreme Court judgments over conflicting High Court decisions, ultimately upholding the interest demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266694</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>