<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1963 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266689</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a total waiver of pre-deposit of dues adjudged and stayed the recovery during the Appeal process, allowing the Stay Petitions. The decision was based on the similarity of issues with a previous case, the inadequacy of the adjudicating authority&#039;s reasoning, and the clear directives provided by relevant Notifications and Circulars, ensuring fairness and adherence to established legal provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:54:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1963 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266689</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a total waiver of pre-deposit of dues adjudged and stayed the recovery during the Appeal process, allowing the Stay Petitions. The decision was based on the similarity of issues with a previous case, the inadequacy of the adjudicating authority&#039;s reasoning, and the clear directives provided by relevant Notifications and Circulars, ensuring fairness and adherence to established legal provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266689</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>