<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1961 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266687</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their claim for Cenvat credit based on invoices issued in the old name of the company. The denial of credit by the Department was deemed incorrect as the Tribunal recognized the old and new names as representing the same legal entity, supported by official notifications and permissions for the name change. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:53:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1961 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266687</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing their claim for Cenvat credit based on invoices issued in the old name of the company. The denial of credit by the Department was deemed incorrect as the Tribunal recognized the old and new names as representing the same legal entity, supported by official notifications and permissions for the name change. The impugned order was set aside, and the appellant&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>