<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1959 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266685</link>
    <description>Reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs used to generate steam meant the credit was to be treated as never taken, so Rule 6(2) could not be invoked for common inputs used in dutiable and exempted products. Because the precondition for Rule 6(2) was absent, Rule 6(3)(b) could not be applied to demand 10% of the sale value of steam. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:51:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402843" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1959 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266685</link>
      <description>Reversal of Cenvat credit on inputs used to generate steam meant the credit was to be treated as never taken, so Rule 6(2) could not be invoked for common inputs used in dutiable and exempted products. Because the precondition for Rule 6(2) was absent, Rule 6(3)(b) could not be applied to demand 10% of the sale value of steam. The demand was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>