<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1955 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266681</link>
    <description>Small scale exemption under the notification depended on whether the aggregate clearances in the preceding financial year stayed within the prescribed threshold. The dispute was whether branded goods cleared on payment of duty had to be added to the prior year&#039;s turnover for eligibility. On the Revenue&#039;s own verification report, inclusion of those clearances still left the preceding year&#039;s total below the limit, so the eligibility condition was satisfied. The assessee was therefore entitled to the exemption, and denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:44:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1955 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266681</link>
      <description>Small scale exemption under the notification depended on whether the aggregate clearances in the preceding financial year stayed within the prescribed threshold. The dispute was whether branded goods cleared on payment of duty had to be added to the prior year&#039;s turnover for eligibility. On the Revenue&#039;s own verification report, inclusion of those clearances still left the preceding year&#039;s total below the limit, so the eligibility condition was satisfied. The assessee was therefore entitled to the exemption, and denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>