https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266677 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It granted the waiver of pre-deposit and emphasized the correct application of statutory provisions in determining duty liability on capital goods cleared to DTA. The Tribunal found the appellant had followed the Assistant Commissioner's direction in calculating duty correctly and that the later-inserted Rule 3(5A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was inapplicable. en-us Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:42:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266677 The Tribunal allowed the appellant's appeal, setting aside the impugned order. It granted the waiver of pre-deposit and emphasized the correct application of statutory provisions in determining duty liability on capital goods cleared to DTA. The Tribunal found the appellant had followed the Assistant Commissioner's direction in calculating duty correctly and that the later-inserted Rule 3(5A) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was inapplicable. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266677