<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1945 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the admissibility of interest on receivables as a deduction, emphasizing that reimbursement to the customer was irrelevant. The Revenue&#039;s objection to this deduction was dismissed due to their failure to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision at a higher authority. The Tribunal also ruled that the disagreement over the commission on sales did not warrant penal action, as it was a genuine interpretation issue rather than intentional misconduct. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and underscoring the importance of adhering to tax law interpretations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 21:36:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402829" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1945 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the admissibility of interest on receivables as a deduction, emphasizing that reimbursement to the customer was irrelevant. The Revenue&#039;s objection to this deduction was dismissed due to their failure to challenge the Tribunal&#039;s earlier decision at a higher authority. The Tribunal also ruled that the disagreement over the commission on sales did not warrant penal action, as it was a genuine interpretation issue rather than intentional misconduct. Consequently, the Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s order and underscoring the importance of adhering to tax law interpretations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>