<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1940 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266666</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit requires the claimant to prove actual receipt and proper accounting of inputs through records of receipt, disposal, consumption and inventory. Mere invoices unaccompanied by movement or receipt of goods do not discharge the burden of proof under Rule 9(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Financial hardship was not established where the balance sheet reflected substantial reserves, surplus and funds available for appropriation. A separate pre-deposit direction against the Managing Director was justified by the admitted use of transactions solely to increase turnover without receipt of goods. Recovery was stayed only upon compliance with the prescribed deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:58:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1940 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266666</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit requires the claimant to prove actual receipt and proper accounting of inputs through records of receipt, disposal, consumption and inventory. Mere invoices unaccompanied by movement or receipt of goods do not discharge the burden of proof under Rule 9(5) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Financial hardship was not established where the balance sheet reflected substantial reserves, surplus and funds available for appropriation. A separate pre-deposit direction against the Managing Director was justified by the admitted use of transactions solely to increase turnover without receipt of goods. Recovery was stayed only upon compliance with the prescribed deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266666</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>