<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1936 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266662</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty related to excess raw materials but confirmed the duty demand in a case involving shortages of steel wire rod and alloy wire rod. The appellants&#039; appeal was allowed except for the duty amount, clarifying the application of rules on confiscation and penalties in Central Excise law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 19:56:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402820" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1936 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266662</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation and penalty related to excess raw materials but confirmed the duty demand in a case involving shortages of steel wire rod and alloy wire rod. The appellants&#039; appeal was allowed except for the duty amount, clarifying the application of rules on confiscation and penalties in Central Excise law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>