<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1930 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266655</link>
    <description>The High Court declined interference in a service tax appeal because the appellant did not show any reason for non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit direction. In the absence of such compliance or a satisfactory explanation, the court found no basis to interfere with the order under challenge and concluded that no substantial question of law arose. The issue was therefore decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:09:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1930 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266655</link>
      <description>The High Court declined interference in a service tax appeal because the appellant did not show any reason for non-compliance with the Tribunal&#039;s pre-deposit direction. In the absence of such compliance or a satisfactory explanation, the court found no basis to interfere with the order under challenge and concluded that no substantial question of law arose. The issue was therefore decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>