<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1928 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266653</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exoneration of M/s. Tiruchirapalli District Welfare Fund Committee from penalties under Sections 76, 77, &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Adjudication order was restored, reversing the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), based on the appellant&#039;s cooperation, lack of unreasonable hardship in imposing penalties for Mandap Keeper services, and the involvement of the Collector as the ex-officio President. The Tribunal cited a similar apex court case on service tax constitutionality for Mandap Keepers, emphasizing reasonable cause and directed for consequential relief to be granted accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402792" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1928 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266653</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exoneration of M/s. Tiruchirapalli District Welfare Fund Committee from penalties under Sections 76, 77, &amp;amp; 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Adjudication order was restored, reversing the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals), based on the appellant&#039;s cooperation, lack of unreasonable hardship in imposing penalties for Mandap Keeper services, and the involvement of the Collector as the ex-officio President. The Tribunal cited a similar apex court case on service tax constitutionality for Mandap Keepers, emphasizing reasonable cause and directed for consequential relief to be granted accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266653</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>