<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1927 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266652</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail service tax credit based on the Lease Deed specifying a designated area for providing taxable services. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Lease Deed in determining entitlement to credit and rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument to apply Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It held that service tax paid on the leased area used for taxable services should be allowed as Cenvat credit. No penalty was imposed due to confusion and lack of clarity in previous decisions by the authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1927 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266652</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to avail service tax credit based on the Lease Deed specifying a designated area for providing taxable services. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of the Lease Deed in determining entitlement to credit and rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument to apply Rule 6(3) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. It held that service tax paid on the leased area used for taxable services should be allowed as Cenvat credit. No penalty was imposed due to confusion and lack of clarity in previous decisions by the authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266652</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>