https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266643 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the failure to maintain separate accounts for dutiable and exempted finished goods, alleged non-compliance with Cenvat Credit Rules, demand for recovery amount and penalties, and appeal rejection. The decision focused on the applicability of the retrospective amendment of Rule 6(3)(b) by the Finance Act, 2010, directing verification of the credit reversal process by the Adjudicating Authority. Compliance with the law was emphasized, leading to the appeal being allowed for further examination. en-us Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266643 The Tribunal allowed the appeal in a case involving the failure to maintain separate accounts for dutiable and exempted finished goods, alleged non-compliance with Cenvat Credit Rules, demand for recovery amount and penalties, and appeal rejection. The decision focused on the applicability of the retrospective amendment of Rule 6(3)(b) by the Finance Act, 2010, directing verification of the credit reversal process by the Adjudicating Authority. Compliance with the law was emphasized, leading to the appeal being allowed for further examination. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266643