<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1917 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266642</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 4,28,435/- due to errors in confirmation based solely on the Regional Transport Office report. It granted the benefit of a reduced penalty of 25% on the confirmed amount of Rs. 12,43,869/- as the Adjudicating Authority had not extended this benefit initially. The Tribunal emphasized legal provisions and judicial precedents in its decision, ensuring meticulous analysis for justice and adherence to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 17:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1917 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266642</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs. 4,28,435/- due to errors in confirmation based solely on the Regional Transport Office report. It granted the benefit of a reduced penalty of 25% on the confirmed amount of Rs. 12,43,869/- as the Adjudicating Authority had not extended this benefit initially. The Tribunal emphasized legal provisions and judicial precedents in its decision, ensuring meticulous analysis for justice and adherence to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>