https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266639 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming demand, penalties, and confiscation of goods against the appellant, who faced shortages in raw materials and excess final products. The Tribunal found the shortages to be insignificant and not indicative of clandestine removal, emphasizing industry norms. It noted no evidence of mala fide intentions regarding excess goods and ruled that shortages alone do not justify demand confirmation or penalties. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue's claims and the importance of considering industry norms and precedents. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:07:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266639 The Tribunal set aside the order confirming demand, penalties, and confiscation of goods against the appellant, who faced shortages in raw materials and excess final products. The Tribunal found the shortages to be insignificant and not indicative of clandestine removal, emphasizing industry norms. It noted no evidence of mala fide intentions regarding excess goods and ruled that shortages alone do not justify demand confirmation or penalties. The appeal was allowed with consequential relief, highlighting the lack of evidence supporting the Revenue's claims and the importance of considering industry norms and precedents. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 14 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266639