https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266634 The court upheld the Respondent's decision to continue the prohibition order against the Petitioner, a Customs House Agent, due to violations of licensing regulations, including allowing unauthorized persons to handle customs clearance work. The court found the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Customs adequate and emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, noting that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate compliance with regulations. The court dismissed the Petitioner's Writ Petition, affirming the Respondent's decision and closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs awarded. en-us Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 09 Jan 2016 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266634 The court upheld the Respondent's decision to continue the prohibition order against the Petitioner, a Customs House Agent, due to violations of licensing regulations, including allowing unauthorized persons to handle customs clearance work. The court found the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Customs adequate and emphasized the importance of procedural fairness, noting that the Petitioner failed to demonstrate compliance with regulations. The court dismissed the Petitioner's Writ Petition, affirming the Respondent's decision and closing the connected Miscellaneous Petition without costs awarded. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266634