<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1904 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266629</link>
    <description>Thirteen writ petitions were dismissed by the court as the petitioners did not qualify as related parties under Section 245C(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s findings, determining that the petitioners did not meet the conditions of substantial interest required to be considered related parties. The court clarified that substantial interest involves direct shareholding and does not extend to indirect shareholding through other entities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 11:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402768" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1904 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266629</link>
      <description>Thirteen writ petitions were dismissed by the court as the petitioners did not qualify as related parties under Section 245C(1) of the Income Tax Act. The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s findings, determining that the petitioners did not meet the conditions of substantial interest required to be considered related parties. The court clarified that substantial interest involves direct shareholding and does not extend to indirect shareholding through other entities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>