<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1903 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266628</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, citing the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. However, the court granted relief under Section 220(6) to stay the demand, directing the petitioner to deposit ten per cent of the demand within four weeks. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to dispose of the appeal within four months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2015 16:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1903 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266628</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the assessment order under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, citing the availability of an alternative statutory remedy. However, the court granted relief under Section 220(6) to stay the demand, directing the petitioner to deposit ten per cent of the demand within four weeks. The Commissioner (Appeals) was instructed to dispose of the appeal within four months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>