https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266615 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 20,41,412/- made by the AO on account of a difference in arm's length price, as the appellant engaged in other business activities beyond services to the parent company. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) in restricting the disallowance under section 14A to Rs. 1,21,752/-, finding the appellant's arguments reasonable and dismissing the Revenue's appeal. en-us Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Oct 2015 15:05:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266615 The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 20,41,412/- made by the AO on account of a difference in arm's length price, as the appellant engaged in other business activities beyond services to the parent company. Additionally, the Tribunal agreed with the CIT(A) in restricting the disallowance under section 14A to Rs. 1,21,752/-, finding the appellant's arguments reasonable and dismissing the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266615