https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266609 The appeal was partly allowed as the appellant's challenge regarding the validity of the assessment order and reopening under sections 143(2) and 148 was not pressed. Disallowance of interest and remuneration due to non-compliance with Income Tax Act sections was confirmed, but the non-filing of the partnership deed was considered curable. The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the disallowance and rejecting the challenge against interest under section 234B based on precedents and the Calcutta High Court's judgment. en-us Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266609 The appeal was partly allowed as the appellant's challenge regarding the validity of the assessment order and reopening under sections 143(2) and 148 was not pressed. Disallowance of interest and remuneration due to non-compliance with Income Tax Act sections was confirmed, but the non-filing of the partnership deed was considered curable. The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, deleting the disallowance and rejecting the challenge against interest under section 234B based on precedents and the Calcutta High Court's judgment. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266609