<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1881 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266606</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing the assessee to prove that the payments to foreign agents were sales commission for orders from abroad. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of providing documentary evidence to establish the nature of services rendered by non-residents for determining tax liability under sec.40(a)(i) and sec.195 of the I.T. Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1881 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266606</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, directing the assessee to prove that the payments to foreign agents were sales commission for orders from abroad. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of providing documentary evidence to establish the nature of services rendered by non-residents for determining tax liability under sec.40(a)(i) and sec.195 of the I.T. Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>