https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174814 A procedural requirement for filing three typed copies of appeal papers was treated as directory where the necessary documents were filed and the defect concerned only the number of copies; such non-compliance was regarded as a curable irregularity, not a fatal defect, and time could be allowed for formal compliance. Refusal to condone delay in filing the copies was described as a discretionary order that should not be disturbed absent perversity or irrationality, and no such flaw was found. On service law, denial of increments and allied benefits for not passing a departmental test was not sustained where exemption had been granted, so the employee's benefits were allowed. en-us Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:41:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174814 A procedural requirement for filing three typed copies of appeal papers was treated as directory where the necessary documents were filed and the defect concerned only the number of copies; such non-compliance was regarded as a curable irregularity, not a fatal defect, and time could be allowed for formal compliance. Refusal to condone delay in filing the copies was described as a discretionary order that should not be disturbed absent perversity or irrationality, and no such flaw was found. On service law, denial of increments and allied benefits for not passing a departmental test was not sustained where exemption had been granted, so the employee's benefits were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 06 Oct 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174814