https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174813 Allowing review vacates the original decree and substitutes a new operative decree. An appeal must be directed against the decree in force after review; a challenge confined to the reviewed decree cannot indirectly unsettle the original decree once it has been displaced and no competent appeal was filed against it. Where the High Court treated the review as wrongly entertained, it should have allowed the cross appeal and dismissed the respondent's appeal, because the original decree had already become final. The Supreme Court restored the decree of the court below and held that the appeal was entitled to succeed in favour of the appellant. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:36:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174813 Allowing review vacates the original decree and substitutes a new operative decree. An appeal must be directed against the decree in force after review; a challenge confined to the reviewed decree cannot indirectly unsettle the original decree once it has been displaced and no competent appeal was filed against it. Where the High Court treated the review as wrongly entertained, it should have allowed the cross appeal and dismissed the respondent's appeal, because the original decree had already become final. The Supreme Court restored the decree of the court below and held that the appeal was entitled to succeed in favour of the appellant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Mar 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=174813