<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 1856 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266581</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments on liability for service tax under the recruitment of manpower and supply services category. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the applicability of the limitation period for the show cause notice issued, holding that the notice demanding service tax liability for the relevant period was hit by limitation, except for the period within the limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2015 12:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=402668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 1856 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266581</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s arguments on liability for service tax under the recruitment of manpower and supply services category. However, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant on the applicability of the limitation period for the show cause notice issued, holding that the notice demanding service tax liability for the relevant period was hit by limitation, except for the period within the limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=266581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>